Tagged with SMS

Announcing Texthorse: Whitehorse’s First SMS Game

TexthorseI’m really pleased to be able to publicly announce a project that I’ve been working on with some partners for some time now.

It’s called Texthorse, and it’s a text-messaging treasure hunt that will take place for 5 weeks throughout the entire city of Whitehorse. We’re launching on Tuesday, November 27.

As many readers here know, for quite some time I’ve been interested in the potential creative and business opportunities that mobile telecommunications technologies offer.

To me, mobile today feels like the web felt back in 1994: full of explosive potential. But I think mobile contains more promise than even the pure web does today.

Mobile is an incredibly disruptive medium in the sense that it’s ubiquitous and so can have an effect anywhere and anytime. Leveraging that effectiveness is an interesting challenge, and it’s a challenge I’m hoping to engage with Texthorse. Continue reading

Tagged , , ,

Still Life of a Text Message


When an artist composes a still life of a bowl of fruit or a vase of flowers, it is often with the intent of paying studied homage to a subject that has been rendered nearly invisible by its ubiquity.

Here, then, is my still life of that most common of contemporary artifacts: the text message. Continue reading

Tagged , , ,

Only Morons Chat and Drive

If you operate a mobile phone while driving, you are one of the 17 million Canadians who are complete and utter morons.

No offense, though. Until very recently I was a moron, too.

Seriously, though: research has demonstrated again and again that even chatting hands-free on a mobile phone impairs you more than driving drunk.

And so the title sticks: if you’re willing to endanger your own life, the lives of your passengers, the lives of others using the roadways and even the sidewalks, just to take a call or text message, then you are a moron.

You might find my assessment shocking. Strong-handed, even.

After all, unlike with drunk driving, chatting on a mobile phone while driving is an acceptable social norm.

It is commonly practised. Just look around next time you’re on the road. Tons of people do it.

(And take note of how drivers you see talking on a phone are driving too slow, or too fast, just ran a light, or are creeping over into your lane.)

But therein lies the problem of mobile phones in cars: they are socially acceptable.

As once was driving without a seatbelt. And driving drunk.

So this unsafe practice has woven itself into the fabric of our daily activities and become a part of the pattern.

But that doesn’t mean it’s right.

Only recently have we begun to pay attention to the risks of using mobile devices while driving, despite the fact that researchers have been identifying them for years.

Part of the reason for that is our punch drunk love affair with mobile phones.

Lawmakers, policymakers, social activists and Joe Q. Public alike are all addicted to their devices.

Which has led to our current state of wilful ignorance.

Five years ago, for example, the U.S. Federal government suppressed a Department of Transportation study that clearly revealed the dangers of operating mobile devices while driving.

It seems the lust for telecom company campaign contributions overrode the requirements of national public safety.

Another problem is a lack of real-world statistical evidence.

Very few jurisdictions record the relationship of a mobile device to an automobile accident, despite frequent evidence of such.

MADD can report with confidence that in 2007, almost 13,000 people died in accidents related to alcohol.

But there are only rough estimates for deaths related to cell phones, despite the fact that researchers have proven the practice’s extreme risks.

One Harvard study estimated 2,600 deaths in 2002.

Project forward from that study and you could say that about 8,000 people died as a result of road accidents caused by mobile phone use just last year.

And that the number is steadily increasing.

Meanwhile, our governments seems conflicted about how to handle the matter.

And that lack of leadership is potentially harmful.

Transport Canada tells us that, “there is an increased risk of collision when using a cell phone, even if it is hands-free.”

Yet, this same government agency has approved vehicles for sale in Canada that include built-in hands-free systems as a standard feature.

From a legislative perspective, jurisdiction falls on provincial and territorial governments.

And the provinces and territories are all over the map, so to speak, on the matter of cell phone use while driving.

Newfoundland, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Ontario have made operating a handheld mobile device while driving illegal.

British Columbia is “consulting” on the matter, and is considering banning even handsfree devices.

Alberta and Prince Edward Island say existing unsafe- and distracted-driving laws cover the matter just fine.

Meanwhile, Saskatchewan has launched an educational campaign to highlight the dangers and risks of operating devices while driving.

Saskatchewan’s efforts might seem pithy, but police say bans are almost impossible to enforce, so education may be the most effective approach.

As for the mobile and auto industries, well, they don’t make any money off of safety.

So there’s no movement there.

With such an inconsistent message coming from government, law enforcement, and industry, it’s no wonder drivers have adopted a system of anarchy when using their mobile phones in the car.

For the time being at least, it falls down to us to self-regulate.

So that’s where the moron thing comes in.

If by simply name-calling I can get just one of you to stash your mobile phone while you’re driving, then I’ve contributed to the safety of my community.

Heck, I might have even saved a life.

Even better, if you take this sensibility out into the community, we can have an even broader impact.

Let your friends and family know that you disapprove of their cell phone use in cars.

Don’t loan your vehicle to people who chat and drive.

Heck, honk at people you see doing it.

Because even if government gets it together enough to implement a cohesive legal standard, police will have a very difficult time enforcing it.

And, really, it’s up to us anyway. We’re all grown ups. We shouldn’t need cops to slap our wrists into submission.

We, individually and as a community, should be ready and willing to work for the safety of ourselves and others, of our own volition.

Because if we can’t, well… we’re all morons.

Originally published in the Yukon News on Friday, July 31, 2009.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Do Traffic Lights Enable Auto-Texters?

One of the concepts I discovered while researching this week’s Geek Life column (which will be published here and in the Yukon News tomorrow) is that of risk compensation.

Risk compensation posits that we accept more risk as we sense a greater degree of safety and security around us.

So, for example, bikers who wear helmets travel faster and more aggressively than those who do not, generally negating the safety element of the helmet. In contrast, bikers who do not wear helmets travel at a slower pace, demonstrate more environmental awareness, and exhibit greater caution when, say, crossing an intersection.

So what effect does risk compensation have on text messaging in motor vehicles (an activity which reduces one’s reaction time by over 30%)?

I wonder if the safety-oriented design of roadways doesn’t give drivers a false sense of security that makes texting seem okay? Does the system of road markings, signs, and traffic lights seem to afford the luxury of textual distraction?

I’m just wondering…

Tagged , , , , ,

Graphic of US-State Texting Bans

Here’s an interesting interactive graphicof bans on text messaging while driving in US States (Map of Texting Bans for US Drivers) .

Map of Texting Bans for US Drivers

Map of Texting Bans for US Drivers

It’s interesting to note that Alaska, just across the international border from where I live, has a full ban. Yukon drivers, however, remain unconstrained.

That’s too bad. Research performed by the independent Transportation Research Laboratory (Dangers of Texting While Driving) has found that drivers who text are significantly more impaired than those who have been consuming alcohol or smoking pot:

Reaction times to trigger stimuli were around 35% slower when writing a text message. In the earlier studies, alcohol consumption to the legal limit caused a 12% reaction time increase whilst cannabis caused reaction times to slow by 21%.

Tagged , , , , ,

More Notes on the Decline of Voice Mail

Once upon a time voice mail was the killer app. But as a new generation evolves, the messaging medium is being abandoned for another that’s much more efficient: text messaging.

“More than 30 percent of voice mail messages remain unheard for three days or longer, according to uReach Technologies,” an article on Boston.com explains (At the tone, please don’t leave a message).

And I, personally, find the habits of two of the articles’ subjects indicative of the contemporary effectiveness of voice mail:

“Brian Walshe, 32 … keeps his phone’s mailbox full to ward off new messages.”

“Ja-Nae Duane, 32 … deletes many of her voice mails without even listening.”

And the article cites these figures from a Opinion Research Corporation survery done for Sprint:

Those under the age of 30 are four times more likely to respond within minutes to a text message than to a voice mail. Adults 30 and older are twice as likely to respond within minutes to a text message than to a voice message…

Only at age 65, reports the survey, does voice mail return to favour.

Statistics like these, along with what I’ve observed of the habits of those around me, indicate that for younger people voice mail is on the way out. The more succinct medium, text messaging, is replacing it.

Tagged , , , ,

Voice Mail is “Ancient”

I love this article at StarTribune.com, “Voice-mail calls, but do we care?“.

The article goes to great length to fully diss this stone age technology (it’s almost as old as Star Wars!), but I can sum it up much more simply: voice mail sucks.

I know it’s sometimes not great for business, but I rarely check my voice mail. As a couple of subjects in the article remark, keeping up with more-efficient forms of communication like SMS (text messaging), IM (like AIM, GoogleTalk, and Skype) and even email (yuck!) take enough time. In the article, Yen Cheong, 32, a book publicist in New York, sums it up well:

“If you left a message, I have to dial in, dial in my code,” Cheong said. “Then I mess up and redial. Then once I hear the message, I need the phone number. I try to write it down, and then I have to rewind the message to hear it again,” she added, feigning exhaustion.

That’s just it. Voice mail is an incredibly clumsy, time-consuming process of communication that almost always ends up in frustration. And, typically, before I can respond to a voice mail message, I’ve been distracted by something else which is, more often than not, an email or text message.

Granted, Google Voice now offers voice-mail-to-email translation services. But it’s a flawed beast (even though so many other features of the service totally rock) and I have yet to receive one email from Google Voice that even remotely resembles the spoken verbiage of the original voice message.

It’s to the point for me that I communicate almost exclusively with friends, colleagues, and clients who have also adjusted to more modern forms of communication. The folks who rely on voice messaging are falling by the wayside, for better or for worse.

Tagged , , , ,

Where Sex and Technology Intersect

The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy and Cosmogirl.com recently published the results of their study, Sex and Tech. The results are surprising and enlightening. A few highlights:

  • 33% of young adults (20-26) overall have sent of posted nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves
  • 20% of teens (13-19) overall have sent of posted nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves
  • 38% of teen girls and 39% of teen boys say they have had sexually suggestive text messages or emails— originally meant for someone else—shared with them.
  • 48% of young adult women and 46% of young adult men say it is common for nude or semi-nude photos to get shared with people other than the intended recipient.
  • 22% of teens and 28% of young adults say they are personally more forward and aggressive using sexually suggestive words and images than they are in “real life.”

The survey is worth checking out. It highlights a general movement in society towards a “split personality” in the emerging youth generation, and also a new attitude towards sex and sexuality that will have repercussions on the magnitude of the “free sex” generation the came of age in the 60s.

Tagged , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 297 other followers